Today's hottest deals

HP hp workstation xw8200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP hp workstation xw8200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory1.6 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '19 at 17:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.80GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 51.7
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 49.1
29% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 40.9
8-Core 47.7
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 55
3% 55 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 29
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 41.5
24% 34.6 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 35
25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 11 10 8.2 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 10.6
19% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 39GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw8200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback