To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 04:21
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 82.2
43% 66 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 80.8
11% 81.3 Pts
64-Core 81.9
5% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.28
4% 4.34 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 55 35 54 53 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 53.5
Write 54.3
Mixed 35
SusWrite 47.9
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
100GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 26.3
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 19.2
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 500GB
56GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 14 13 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 25
Write 26
Mixed 17
SusWrite 13.3
27% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback