Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 22:18
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 197
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 558
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 53.4
44% 54.2 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 51.5
42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 137 130 92 65 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 443
Write 398
Mixed 291
SusWrite 132
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 42.7
156% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 176
178% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
731GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 159 168 169 169 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 76.8
Write 37.2
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 166
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 109%
WD WD7501AAES-60Z2A0 750GB
743GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 24 28 29 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 58.2
Write 27.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 25
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $631
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback