PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 14 '19 at 00:48 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$33
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 40 81 33 14 32 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
88GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 255 254 256 252 257 MB/s
|
181%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
378GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 126 133 124 112 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apacer 78.CAGQC.ARC0B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,389x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 808x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 471x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 424x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 295x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 293x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $451 |