HP Pavilion dv6000 (RP297UA#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion dv6000 (RP297UA#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30BB
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 07:01
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2060
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 30.7
29% 37 Pts
4-Core 30.2
8-Core 30.8
4% 30.5 Pts
64-Core 30.8
2% 30.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL 120GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 892C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 26 34 31 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 31.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 32.1
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 22%
Blackpcs 8GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.6 9.3 8.9 9.3 7.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.21% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 8.6
8% 7.03 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback