Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190919
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 207 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 608 56% 470 Pts	64-Core 47.1 3% 47.1 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 50.2 49% 56.6 fps	MRender 44.6 Gravity 51.4 Splatting 51.1 40% 49 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 28.1 16% 21.6 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 21.7 16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB 7,536 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 258 261 259 256 259 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 775 Write 644 Mixed 771 SusWrite 304 140% 623 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 99.8 4K Mixed 46.2 164% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 694 DQ Write 687 DQ Mixed 586 469% 656 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 131%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 84GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 436 421 370 370 371 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 447 Mixed 440 SusWrite 398 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 54.5 181% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 248 186% 248 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 26.8 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 22.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,836x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	979x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,360x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	508x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	406x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16