Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ar0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ar0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85DE
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 06:23
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 38.7
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 144
44% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 404
36% 306 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 85DE) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.02.06
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 3.62
2% 3.12 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 3.48
2% 3.05 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 377 370 340 352 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 435
Write 344
Mixed 378
SusWrite 360
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 22.3
87% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 42.9
DQ Mixed 36.5
26% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 295%
Samsung 860 EVO 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 294 284 245 253 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 315
Write 286
Mixed 280
SusWrite 268
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 21.6
76% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 74.5
67% 101 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.5
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ar0xxx Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY x360 Convertible 13-ar0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback