Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory123.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 00:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6240
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 210
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 883
79% 670 Pts
64-Core 2,301
142% 2,301 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
906GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1664 1754 1766 1766 1711 1750 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,837
Write 1,653
Mixed 1,243
SusWrite 1,735
364% 1,617 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 69.1
252% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 875
659% 882 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 296%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40CM2-CVF 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,305
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback