Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 158 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 210 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M 15,605 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3904) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.59% Terrible	Lighting 8.17 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 9.47 7% 8.71 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 8.47 Splatting 8.83 6% 7.72 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.59% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_FCCT256MX100SSD1 256GB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 288 232 265 261 263 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 411 Write 329 Mixed 282 SusWrite 268 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 29.4 95% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 148 141% 215 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-073.A00LF Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.4% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	27x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	5x
GeForce GT 635MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,113 samples	3x

RAM
RMT3150ED58E8W1600 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 6GBUnknownBench 46%, 663 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 18 samples	3x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16