Today's hottest deals

Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGbt___ AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 8I915P-D
Memory1.5 GB free of 1.25 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2.53GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 17.3
27% 33.2 Pts
4-Core 18.6
8-Core 19.9
3% 19.2 Pts
64-Core 19.3
1% 19.3 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.49 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 1.7
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 21 20 27 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Read 8
Write 7.1
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 21.5
12% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 31%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 2
6% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
1024, 256 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
9.52% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback