| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R930 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A2 |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140605 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '19 at 16:23 |
| Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
|
64.7%
Good
|
52% 82.3 Pts
|
45% 378 Pts
|
40% 639 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
13% 16 fps
|
14% 17.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$122
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 165 173 182 170 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
121% 164 MB/s
|
326% 2.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1G73QH0- 1x8GB
1 of 16 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
52% 76.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R930 Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R930
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 4x |
| Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples | 4x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v21stBench 57%, 469 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
| RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples | 5x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |