Gigabyte GA-F2A75-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 18:13
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20% Very poor
Memory 25.1
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 94.1
33% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 85
8-Core 94.1
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 95
6% 95 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 20%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 79 105 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 98.4
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 71%
General UDisk 16GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 2.6 7.6 9.6 9.8 8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.9
Write 5.5
SusWrite 6.4
10% 9.93 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 285
14% 285 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75-D3H Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback