Today's hottest deals

Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardWibtek B75-M
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 12:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 512
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 3.47
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$99
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 296 296 298 295 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 471
Mixed 302
SusWrite 304
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 38.8
128% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 239
208% 311 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 108%
Mass Storage Device 2GB
1GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.21% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 3.3
8% 7.82 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
81% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.21%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback