Today's hottest deals

Foxconn 946 7MA Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTELR AWRDACPI
MotherboardFoxconn 946 7MA Series  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '19 at 19:09
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E1500
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 35.7
35% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 34.2
8-Core 40.9
5% 37.6 Pts
64-Core 42.9
3% 42.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Zotac(19DA 5194) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 9.22
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP8004H 80GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: QW100-61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 15 21 22 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 28.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 19.6
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 6.5 7.3 6.5 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 6.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 6.9
10% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.2
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 946 7MA Series Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn 946 7MA Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback