Today's hottest deals

Alienware ASM100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware ASM100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0J8H4R
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 21:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 93
2-Core 162
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 256
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GPU
Dell(1028 066A) 2GB
CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 18.5
17% 18.3 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 15.8
16% 20 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 195 240 258 211 287 MB/s
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.1% Very good
Read 245
Write 94.5
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 238
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 38.3
108% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 204
173% 250 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASM100 Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback