Today's hottest deals

Penguin Icebreaker 4824

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPenguin Icebreaker 4824  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR3-F
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 10:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 159
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 620
55% 464 Pts
64-Core 1,512
94% 1,512 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.3% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 73.8
50% 66.2 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 52.5
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xstar 120GB 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 907XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 30 29 26 30 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 446
Write 180
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 43.8
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.2
36% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 14.6
14% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Icebreaker 4824 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Penguin Icebreaker 4824

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback