Today's hottest deals

Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC Field PG M5  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E35697378
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '16 at 08:42
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6440EQ
no information, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 397
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 191B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4501
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 6.53
5% 7.56 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 13.5
8% 8.54 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK512MBF 512GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 504
Write 349
Mixed 143
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 11
99% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 33.7
63% 125 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC Field PG M5 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback