Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 100 2-Core 196 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 484 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5200M 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 1534) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 3.56 3% 4.16 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 2.96 3% 4.28 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 445 436 22 8.1 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 414 Write 416 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 241 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 4.7 44% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 46.7 DQ Write 0.5 DQ Mixed 23 17% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 91%
Seagate BUP Slim 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 82GB free Firmware: 0109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 27 27 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.2% Very poor	Read 33.4 Write 27.2 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 28.7 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 7.3 1,276% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GB 13,765 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	982x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	160x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	31x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	25x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28