Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '19 at 11:02
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 48 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 68.4 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 161 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 636 58% 489 Pts	64-Core 1246 77% 1246 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 81GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,465 Write 429 Mixed 826 680% 907 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 29.4 5,278% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 417 DQ Write 89.7 DQ Mixed 103 1,391% 203 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 85%
WD Elements 2621 4TB 1,693 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 91 89 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 98 Write 88.8 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 91.4 114% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.7 163% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	MC Read 51 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 32.1 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16