PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP xw9400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A1Ch |
Memory | 21.3 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20091210 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 04 '19 at 12:53 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 2419 EE
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia NVS 315
Nvidia(10DE 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.56
|
1.49%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 25 15 22 19 29 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 57GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 24351stBench 43%, 91 samples | 4x |
CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 84351stBench 42%, 19 samples | 1x |
CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 23561stBench 40%, 37 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 2x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 1x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $200 |