Lenovo 6476CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 6476CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 6476CTO
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 18:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 68%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo L7100
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 49.9
1-Core 9
2-Core 15.4
20% 24.8 Pts
4-Core 16
8-Core 16.5
2% 16.2 Pts
64-Core 17.2
1% 17.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20B5) 384MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1867
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.2% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.25 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.16 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MCCOE64G8MPP-0VA 64GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PS105L15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 36 41 31 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 88.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 38.6
13% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 4.3
25% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 0.3
4% 1.3 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback