Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20.9GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory15.8 GB free of 20.9063 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2396 x 1354 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170519
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 09:11
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 149
52% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 147
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.15.1.65
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 15.3
11% 16.8 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 17.5
8% 9.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 1.5TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 13 33 64 17 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 8.8 18 16 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 14.3
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 14.3
24% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096, 512, 256, 128, 32 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback