Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 14:28
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 162
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 245
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 24.20.100.6290
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 3.78
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.35
0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 34GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 594
Write 453
Mixed 450
374% 499 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 21.1
3,440% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 25.1
231% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback