Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 4238 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.4% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 55.2 2-Core 94.3 50% 76.4 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 262 28% 221 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 30.7 20% 26.4 fps	MRender 33 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 24.5 23% 29 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CRUCIAL_CT64M225 64GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1916 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 30 38 36 31 23 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 120 Write 82.8 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 34.5 18% 82 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 7.5 38% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 3x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.3 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Opteron 4180AMDBench 52%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7WD240HAFV-00003 240GBSamsungBench 76%, 153 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 37%, 4 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16