Today's hottest deals

Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170519
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 02:48
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 113
48% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 163
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 40.4
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 36.2
Splatting 32.3
30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 97 92 85 98 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 38.5
Write 106
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 86.8
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback