Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 07 '19 at 22:29
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 299
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 1353) 1GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 17.5
17% 18 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 16.7
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$58
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 124 117 119 129 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69% Good
Read 118
Write 129
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 122
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69%
Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
117GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 87 86 84 85 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 70.4
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23
58GB free, PID 558b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 99.2
Write 23.3
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 30.2
44% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C11 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback