Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6180 SE 12 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 40.4 36% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 268 24% 200 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM240 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 204Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 220 222 220 220 224 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 281 Write 228 Mixed 197 SusWrite 220 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 21.2 71% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 19.1 75% 168 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273CH0-YH9 8x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 8 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.6% Below average	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.5 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16