Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X11DAi-N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X11DAi-N  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DAi-N
Memory35.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '19 at 08:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 173
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 681
60% 511 Pts
64-Core 2,986
185% 2,986 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V Graphics Adapter
AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 19.7
12% 18.9 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 28.1
18% 20.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1073 954 846 810 769 730 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,633
Write 1,196
Mixed 650
SusWrite 864
242% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50.3
181% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 455
366% 523 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 199%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GL7AFR4N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 9.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X11DAi-N Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X11DAi-N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback