Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 34.9 28% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 44.8 8-Core 51.5 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 50.6 3% 50.6 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 058B) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2.48 1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB 9,379 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 185 184 201 217 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 324 Write 96.5 Mixed 190 SusWrite 195 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 12.9 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 76.5 DQ Mixed 107 64% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HT5SMRAP 2x4GB 415 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	38x

SSD
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	14x
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	4x
LMT-128M3M 128GBLiteonitBench 64%, 542 samples	3x

RAM
HT5SMRAP 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 415 samples	24x
M7B23H-K 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 92 samples	7x
HT5SMRAP 2x2GBHynixBench 48%, 155 samples	6x