Gigabyte GA-MD71-HB0-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory448GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 448GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MD71-HB0-00  (all builds)
Memory436.4 GB free of 448 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 01:39
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 229
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 861
77% 650 Pts
64-Core 3,250
201% 3,250 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 68
Parallax 81.3
55% 72.3 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 55.5
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 609 615 617 594 597 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,370
Write 1,878
Mixed 1,377
SusWrite 661
298% 1,321 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 45.8
182% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 926
697% 942 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 193%
Great: 277%
Intel SSDPE2ME800G4 800GB
730GB free
Firmware: 8DV10102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 889 887 890 882 889 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 809
Write 887
Mixed 549
SusWrite 886
177% 783 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 41.9
196% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 835
658% 920 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 188%
Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 14x31.9GB
14 of 16 slots used
447GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
118% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 60.5
MC Mixed 43.7
140% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback