IBM System x3650 M4 Server -[7915AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	IBM System x3650 M4 Server -[7915AC1]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM
Memory	13.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20120306
Uptime	58.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 105 46% 75 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 485 43% 363 Pts	64-Core 983 61% 983 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 519 493 488 510 517 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	147% Outstanding	Read 1,975 Write 350 Mixed 627 SusWrite 502 188% 863 MB/s	4K Read 59.1 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 7.4 104% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 53.5 DQ Mixed 91.2 95% 164 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 188%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 3.5TB 1.5TB free Firmware: 3.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 381 348 411 377 342 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	148% Outstanding	Read 1,830 Write 291 Mixed 1,266 SusWrite 376 207% 941 MB/s	4K Read 61.1 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 15.9 131% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 350 261% 344 MB/s

Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.8 3.9 3.5 3 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.41% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 8 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 3.4 8% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 6.41% Great: 65%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 293GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 24.3 Write 19.7 Mixed 20 SusWrite 13.2 25% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 43%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB 3,704 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 68GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 23 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 13.2 26% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Elpida EBJ81RF4EDWA-DJ-F Samsung M393B1G... 128GB 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.4% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 27.4 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.9 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM System x3650 M4 Server -[7915AC1]-

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)