Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory41.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '16 at 02:04
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 585
55% 456 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2680) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 36.8
Parallax 48.5
33% 41.8 fps
MRender 49.2
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 34.3
34% 43.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 520
Write 402
Mixed 418
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 25.6
138% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 45
DQ Write 89.1
DQ Mixed 25.2
31% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71
112GB free
Firmware: 1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 390
Mixed 440
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 28.8
125% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 105
130% 229 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 103%
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71
98GB free
Firmware: 1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.5% Good
Read 265
Write 255
Mixed 260
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 20.7
102% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 93.1
87% 135 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 103%
WL1000GSA6472E 1TB
830GB free
Firmware: 0D0X Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 142
Write 131
Mixed 132
102% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.28
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.33
133% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 95%
WL600GLSA32100 600GB
552GB free
Firmware: 5G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 83.1
Mixed 84.8
68% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.62
149% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 29.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback