Today's hottest deals

Red KVM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRed KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory61.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 04:03
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 1, 28 CPU, 28 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 785
72% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,945
120% 1,945 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Dell(1028 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 160
Parallax 165
138% 165 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 156
Splatting 114
121% 153 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 125%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 105 90 91 26 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24% Poor
Read 209
Write 169
Mixed 183
SusWrite 90.7
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 9
31% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 9
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 8.1
6% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24%
Great: 60%
Qemu HARDDISK 548GB
429GB free
Firmware: 1.5.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 101 48 70 34 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
Read 177
Write 138
Mixed 163
SusWrite 76
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 11
37% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 7.9
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 7.1
5% 7.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 61.8
MC Mixed 41.7
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 115%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KVM Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Red KVM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback