Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 38% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemApple MacBookAir6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-35C1E88140C3E6CF
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150605
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 22:54
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 38%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 34.6
28% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 56.9
8-Core 61.2
8% 59.1 Pts
64-Core 57.9
4% 57.9 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 2.25
1% 1.78 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.74
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SD0128F PCIe 121GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A222821 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 261
Write 156
Mixed 155
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 14.3
49% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 115
89% 122 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
ADATA HD710 1TB
611GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 138
Mixed 48.5
122% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir6,1 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback