Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory50.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 155
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 605
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 2,274
141% 2,274 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128L9S-11 2.5 7mm 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC7110B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 317 321 324 304 320 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 469
Write 325
Mixed 283
SusWrite 318
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 26.3
94% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 199
184% 283 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
704GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 75 73 73 75 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 486
Write 473
Mixed 402
SusWrite 120
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 30.9
109% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 340
254% 337 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 175 177 176 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 152
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 174
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $569
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback