PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111212 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 24 '19 at 04:12 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5660
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
69.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 166 165 162 160 MB/s
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3000DM001-9YN166 2TB
647GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 110 112 110 112 MB/s
|
76.7%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X5680IntelBench 74%, 4,201 samples | 21x |
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples | 12x |
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 20x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 12x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $560 |