HP EliteBook 840 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 07:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 105
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 157
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 198F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 5.84
3% 4.98 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.04
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 339 356 321 344 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 350
Write 336
Mixed 229
SusWrite 340
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 19.9
58% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 147
137% 213 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G4F1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G1 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback