Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 157
2-Core 301
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,053
99% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.4% Very good
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 91.2
81% 94.3 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 87.6
Splatting 77.1
72% 90.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 450 488 490 436 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 454
SusWrite 404
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 62.3
213% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 126%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
807GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 40.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 40.7
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
189% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.6 4.9 6.9 6.5 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 12.5
Mixed 13
SusWrite 5.1
16% 13 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.8
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 27
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $532
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback