Seagate Windows NAS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Seagate Windows NAS (all builds)
Motherboard	USI n0a0202
Memory	0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141211
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '16 at 01:56
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom C2338 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.5% Below average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 11.1 2-Core 36 28% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 36.3 8-Core 35.1 5% 35.7 Pts	64-Core 36.3 2% 36.3 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$26 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 675GB free (System drive) Firmware: LV5B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 63 19399560 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 16 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 19681299 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 201 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 50 48 841809970 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 28 (C2) HDA temperature 50 52 51539607602 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 29 19399560 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.2% Very good	Read 127 Write 118 Mixed 118 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.06 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.17 23% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 103%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$26 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 647GB free Firmware: LV5B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 63 80398701 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 16 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4598318 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 201 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 51 808190000 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 28 (C2) HDA temperature 48 49 51539607600 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 14 80398701 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	71.9% Very good	Read 128 Write 123 Mixed 127 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.06 9% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS256MSK64W6N 1x2GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 0.3 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Seagate Windows NAS

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)