Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G620-$30 12,899 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 46.4 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 46.4 32% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 90.8 8-Core 40.4 10% 65.6 Pts	64-Core 30.3 2% 30.3 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: LF1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 109 119 97 107 99 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 172 Write 115 Mixed 134 SusWrite 108 30% 132 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 18.2 52% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 31.3 30% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 909GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 77 55 53 90 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 86.4 Write 84 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 74.6 57% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.3 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 4.9 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	54x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	27x
Pentium G620Intel $30Bench 46%, 12,899 samples	14x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	35x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16