Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Red RHEV Hypervisor (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070101
Uptime	26.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '16 at 08:22
Run Duration	66 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge) 30 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 41.1 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 87.2 34% 58.1 Pts	4-Core 93.8 8-Core 82.5 12% 88.2 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 65%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x3GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 1 slots used 3GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.6 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16