Today's hottest deals

Asus X75VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X75VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VD
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 20:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 85
2-Core 133
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.02 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 229 225 229 223 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 463
Write 445
Mixed 302
SusWrite 235
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 33.1
106% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 332
258% 353 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VD Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback