RDO OpenStack Compute

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemRDO OpenStack Compute  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 13:32
Run Duration51 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 143
46% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 142
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Canonica VirtIO 107GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 47.8
Write 126
Mixed 156
85% 110 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.4
700% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 31.6
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback