Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon L5320 9 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 42.6 34% 45.8 Pts	4-Core 84.3 8-Core 84.7 11% 84.5 Pts	64-Core 78.7 5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Gigabyte(1458 4050) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.15 0% 0.16 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC128HBFU-000L1 128GB 1,498 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 40GB free Firmware: CXM12K1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 102 101 101 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 126 Write 114 Mixed 101 SusWrite 101 25% 110 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 18.9 66% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 20.8 DQ Write 42.7 DQ Mixed 22.1 20% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 68%
Samsung HD400LD 400GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: WQ100-14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 12 12 32 30 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 54.7 Write 57.2 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 24.4 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.6 5.6 3.3 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Read 30.2 Write 6 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 4.5 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1 63% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 16%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium D 3.40GHzIntelBench 32%, 3,806 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 7600 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,208 samples	1x

SSD
S396 30GBAdataBench 31%, 52 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x