Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '16 at 23:09
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-7300 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 104
55% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 104
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
ASRock(1849 9996) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 3.59
4% 4.12 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 4.65
3% 4.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 79.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 38.5
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.33
91% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
55GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 79.9
Write 94.7
Mixed 15.5
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.55
91% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50%
Great: 88%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power DB 500GB
15GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 30.4
Mixed 14.8
31% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.19
18% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback