Asus H61M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 15:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 145
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 207
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
MSI(1462 320A) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 30.4
14% 27.1 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 32.3
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 54 56 93 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 88
Write 82.5
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 70.4
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
53GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 47 49 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 54.8
Write 55.5
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 49.3
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback