Today's hottest deals

Packard AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard AWRDACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard Cuba MS-7301
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6400
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 36.8
26% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 43.3
8-Core 42.5
6% 42.9 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Asus(1043 9010) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 1.22
2% 2.64 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS Q 250GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.BQE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 22 24 25 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 32
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 23.5
20% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback