HP p6604f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
SystemHP p6604f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '15 at 17:36
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 97.2
34% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 91
8-Core 92.7
12% 91.8 Pts
64-Core 94.7
6% 94.7 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.3.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 90.4
Write 88.2
Mixed 81.9
65% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.38
96% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 76%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
101GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 28
Write 27.3
Mixed 27.8
36% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.24
49% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 32GB
17GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 3.79
Mixed 6.15
10% 9.83 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.09
93% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 14%
Typical p6604f Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p6604f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback