Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '19 at 10:14
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-3770 25 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 179 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 180 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.2% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 72.8 49% 65.7 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 55.9 Splatting 52.5 47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 86GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,145 Write 1,083 Mixed 1,355 337% 1,528 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 54.9 179% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 303 223% 295 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.9 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $89Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499