Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion 590-p0057c Desktop Rfrbd PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 843B
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '19 at 06:17
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 121 2-Core 228 85% 148 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 746 76% 613 Pts	64-Core 908 56% 908 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 6,488 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 841F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 40.8 0% 28.8 fps	MRender 66.8 Gravity 66 Splatting 54.7 50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 615GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1307 1284 1314 1329 337 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,297 Write 1,326 Mixed 956 SusWrite 1,149 266% 1,182 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 58 210% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 668 DQ Mixed 269 307% 521 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 255%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 675GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 78 100 81 66 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 33.2 Write 129 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 89.4 50% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA2 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 183 183 185 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 182 Write 181 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 184 191% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 23.1 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	26x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	21x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	12x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	2x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16